Disclaimer:I’d written this piece after Dravid’s hundred at Lords, and delayed posting it. For greater effect, I wanted to post it after our victory the 2nd test against England, which was not to be. The stubborn Test cricket fan in me was hoping, nay, praying for an Indian victory despite the stiff target of 478. Obviously expecting Rahul Dravid to do the needful. Now that we’ve lost, I find it’s still a great time to celebrate the man, when we’re back to cursing our team.Rahul Dravid’s perceived niceness has, over the 15 year course of his career, moulded itself into an intriguing, exquisite sculpture. Much like his game, it has been cast in stone and placed on a pedestal for a utopian world to follow.
Which makes me want to give it one slight nudge and watch it shatter into a billion pieces.
Partly because I detest nice people. It started way back in school when the teacher’s pet scored more than me, and then snowballed into a visceral hatred. People who turn the other cheek. People who skillfully avoid confrontations because they are woefully hopeless. Then there are those who are no fun to fight or argue with, because some Art of Living course has taught them to ‘accept’ whatever shit happens to them with a smile so beatific it makes their Gurus insecure.
I once believed Dravid was all of these people. The world we live in had conditioned me to adore the aggression of a shirt flinging Sourav Ganguly, an intimidating Matthew Hayden and an in-your-face-if-not-on-your-nerves Shahid Afridi.
I ascribe that to naiveté. But we are all allowed that. Come on, even a certain Joker took some time to see the funny side.
So yeah, NOW I see the funny side. And Rahul Dravid’s bad side. It is so bad, it makes a mockery of Pieterson, Warne, Symonds and Harbhajan. Not Sreesanth, because anything can make a mockery of him.
He is an egoist, sadist and masochist rolled into one: everything Buddha wouldn’t approve of.A monumental desire to win shows up as an unyielding capacity to suffer pain, and an insatiable pleasure in inflicting it. More than wincing with his pain, he smirks at a spinner’s twisted wrists, the fast bowler’s aching shoulders and the close-in fielder’s palms-in-waiting.
Ask the Aussies who played that Kolkata test in 2001.
He’s a rebel all right. With a cause. The conventional definition of rebel: ‘a person who resists authority, control, or convention’ applies to him, but means something else.
Guzzling down insane amounts of lager, beating up the pub owner and waking up with a headache and a paunch? Really? That’s…
rebellion?Going fishing when it’s time to practice? Maybe, but only if fishing was more fun than winning.
Sex scandals ? The world and some of its women are way too insecure to call them ‘exploits’ and get that momentary high. Rather play the field when you’re on it.
And sledging ? Why call the bowler’s mom a bitch when you can effortlessly flick his most lethal yorker to the boundary? Or when you can ignore his most cleverly disguised out-swinger?Why talk shit when you have a steely, determined gaze that crushes the most solid of resolves? Imagine The Godfather issuing empty threats instead of just wiping out rival families.
He’s a rebel all right. When the stakes are mercilessly high.Like returning Allan Donald’s verbal volleys with his bat, back in the 1997 tour of South Africa. Only sharper and more insulting. The cheek of a guy just a year old in international cricket!
Or not believing commentators, selectors and even fans when they told him he wasn’t fit for ODIs. Whaddya know, he returned to become the highest scorer in the 1999 World Cup.
He probably scoffed at Bishan Singh Bedi when he predicted a whitewash in Australia in 2003. And chose the Adelaide test as his stage to respond: 233 in the first innings and 72* in the second. When a single brought the scores level, he punched the air. He wasn’t relieved, as much as he was resisting the urge to jump until the deal had been sealed. Everyone in the Indian dressing room had their cameras out:
This was going to be a victory against Australia in Australia, bitches. One eager hit through covers later, he was running with his arms raised, leaping sideways and kissing his cap, as an applauding Sourav Ganguly looked on from the boundary.
What a performer. What a moment.
He’s a rebel all right. Just ask a baffled Sachin Tendulkar, who was left stranded at 194, as a nation discovered someone badass enough to deny its favorite son a double century…against Pakistan.
Nothing is quite as romanticized as the causes of rebellion. Broken homes. Poverty. Loneliness. Failed relationships. Childhood scars.
Dravid has his own scars.
That time when every key Indian cricketer spiraled towards the center of the match fixing scandal. If you bitch about office politics, I shudder to think what his ‘work environment’ was like.
Coming within sniffing distance of a victory while chasing 120 in the West Indies, and getting bowled out for 81. He(and so do Tendulkar, Ganguly and Kumble) seethes everytime anyone brings it up.
The humiliating defeat in the finals of the 2003 World Cup.
These were losses that inspired a team, and many victories.
It’s an unusual cricket world today, inhabited by Ravi Shastri’s clichés, non-threatening West Indian quicks and the every-touch-must-be-an-orgasm T20. For those not easily swayed by style, Dravid’s rebellion provides the substance.
It embodies a solid, oft-undermined lesson: People are more than what they seem to be.
Rahul Dravid, we bow to thee. Not for the first time. And certainly not for the last time.